SonicJive-Your music Your way

Welcome Guest Login or Signup

NEWS FEEDS | SMS SERVICE | BAND MP3 UPLOAD | SONIC JIVE RADIO | BOOKMARK US

PROFILE

GALLERY

ARTICLES

GUESTBOOK

FANS

FAVORITES


View More Pics	Female 100 years old Ottawa, Canada [ 0 ]

CONTACT PANEL

A BIT ABOUT ME

Job:

Other

Smoke:

N/A

Drink:

Yes

Religion:

Agnostic

Orientation:

N/A

Dating status:

Married

Body type:

Slim

MEMBER SINCE:

31 May 2007, 4:30 pm

SIGN:

pisces

LAST LOGIN:

11 Jun 2007, 1:34 am

MY RATING:

0.00

Music

High speed connection advised!

Listen To Live Streaming Radio & Podcast

DSL - Cable
Media Player
iTunes WinAmp Quicktime

DialUp
Media Player
iTunes WinAmp Quicktime

On-Demand Podcast

You can mouse over on the link and then right click and "Save Target As" That way it will download directly to your own machine.

Lives In The Balance

I don't believe this song needs any introduction. This is truly one of the greatest political songs of all time.

Jacob's Ladder

Chumbawumba: "Jacob's Ladder"

It was time The Chumbas weighed into the Iraq debate. Well, not exactly a debate - can you name one person who thinks attacking Iraq would be anything but a naked expression of the worst aspects of global capitalism? On the album (Readymades) Jacob's Ladder told of Churchill's prioritising of the Norwegian Royal Family over rescuing drowning sailors. In this remake, Chumbawumba explore the turning of 9/11 into a brand and the use of people's lives as barter for oil and power. What's more, this isn't a hectoring record, it mixes breakbeat and samples of old folk records to make good music that sticks with you. As the T-shirts say;

"War is terrorism with a bigger budget."

Books

Fiction - Anne Rice, Tom Clancy, Clive Barker.

Non-Fiction - Alvin Toffler, Noam Chomsky, I read a lot of non- fiction.

MY GROUPS

Stray Cat

View All My Groups

RECENT VISITORS

- Report This User

About Yourself

Please check out my personal site

STEPHANIE'S WORLD!

RIGHT CLICK" SAVE TARGET AS" MY OPINION ON THE IRAQ WAR!

Stephanie's World

THIS WEEK'S FEATURE!

Retroactive Legality!

Another week, another example of the President playing the role of "The Decider" and picking and choosing what laws matter and when. We've talked before about the signing statements that he attaches to most bills as he signs them. Statements that provide him with escape mechanisms to ignore laws at his discretion.

His difficulty this time around is that there exist bills on the books that predate his kingship. Bills where no such escape clause exists. One example, the 1996 War Crimes Act. This act defines a war crime to include any violation or grave breach of any of the Geneva Conventions, and applies if either the victim or the perpetrator is a national of the United States or a member of the U.S. armed forces. The penalty may be life imprisonment or death. The death penalty is only invoked if the conduct resulted in the death of one or more victims.

This bill's passage was designed to finally provide the opportunity for redress against Vietnamese soldiers who tortured American POWs. It was passed as part of a flurry of legislation during the period when the United States normalized relations with Vietnam. The bill passed by unanimous consent in the Senate and by a voice vote in the House. It was entirely uncontroversial at the time.

Ten years later, in July of this year, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions applied to the War on Terrorism, providing Geneva Protections to the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. The unstated implication in that ruling is that any interrogation techniques used upon those prisoners that violated Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions is now deemed to be in contravention of the War Crimes act, and so those responsible should be charged.

Now, we won't go too far into the obvious side-conversation about the fact that it was never up to the President to declare these people as exempt from the Geneva Conventions in the first place. You see - this pesky treaty that he is trying to redefine is pretty specific on that issue as well.

Article 4 of the Geneva Convention defines the categories of persons who may be considered as "prisoners of war." The President unilaterally declared that those captured in the War on Terror did not meet those qualifications, and so were exempt. And you know something - that point very well may be debatable. But it is a debate that was never held despite being required by the Conventions. You see, according to Article 5, "should any doubt arise as to whether persons, having committed a belligerent act and having fallen into the hands of the enemy, belong to any of the categories enumerated in Article 4, such persons shall enjoy the protection of the present Convention until such time as their status has been determined by a competent tribunal." No competent tribunal, of course, has adjudicated this matter - until it finally came before the Supreme Court despite all of the President's efforts to block it.

But the treaty is clear - the prisoners were required to have full Geneva protections until deemed NOT to be POWs by a qualified tribunal approved by the International Red Cross. Instead, the exact opposite occurred as they were considered to be exempt from the conventions until a ruling included them.

So what does George need this new legislation for? That seems an appropriate question under the circumstances doesn't it? Why pursue this ridiculous notion that one nation can unilaterally redefine an international treaty when he would no doubt scream bloody murder if Iran attempted to redefine the non-proliferation treaties to exempt themselves?

Oh sure, he'll tell Matt Lauer in interview that it is all about putting necessary tools into the hands of the Intelligence community. But if it were that, why didn't he ensure that it were passed at the start of this war instead of now trying to put them in place backdated to five years ago?

Just how much has gone on that needs to get made legal from the last five years?

No, it is all just a hasty response to the Supreme Court ruling. The prisoners, having been deemed as being included under the conventions, now have rights. So by redefining Article 3 there suddenly becomes no violations of those rights that has occurred to prosecute. Legally, it all just never happened, and for all intents and purposes the Supreme Court ruling is rendered moot.

Of course, you still can't even get the President to acknowledge the rights of the prisoners given that - as recently as on September 6th - he stated that "Neither The President's Proposed Legislation Nor The Detainees' Transfer To Guantanamo Gives The Detainees POW Status."

In other words, he is asking for retroactive immunity against the treatment of people that he still insists are not even covered by the very legislation that he is proposing.

If you can make sense of that train of though, well - you're doing better than me!

And do you really think that he is covering the asses of the people actually doing the dirty work? Or is he looking at the poll numbers and running scared about how a Democrat-controlled congress might choose to use the blatant violations of the rights of people should the word "impeachment" start to sound appealing?

Frankly, this is all that this is about in a nutshell. A "get out of jail free" card for George and his inner circle. That's it, that's all, and anything else is just incidental.

In the meantime, the first casualty of such self-serving legislation is that the cases against the 17 service men and women currently under indictment for abuses at Abu Ghraib will likely become almost impossible to prosecute. Another black eye to the credibility of the American Army as they continue to try and bring stability to Iraq. Another black eye to the military as they find themselves hamstrung in their need to be able to restrain their troops should they cross the line.

It seems a far cry from 2002 doesn't it? When Secretary Rumsfeld lashed out at Iraq for the relatively harmless violation of the rights of captured American Soldiers who were filmed being interviewed and the films aired to the world? Back then, it seemed, the Geneva Conventions still mattered - if only just a little.

In 1996 the Department of Defense fully supported the War Crimes bill, and indeed recommending that it be expanded to include an even longer list of war crimes than it does. Because the United States generally followed the Conventions, it was the military itself that recommended making breaches by U.S. soldiers war crimes as well "because doing so set a high standard for others to follow." The Senate had made no such requirement in the initial draft of the bill, but the military understood that their own sense of honor required that they be held to the same lofty standards that they wanted their future foes to be held to.

But in today's world, respected Generals such as Colin Powell who still believe in setting high standards - regardless of the actions of the opponent - are described as being "confused" and dismissed by this administration. And people who understand far too well the ramifications of torture such as Senator McCain are also blasted for wanting no part in making it an institutionalized part of standard operating procedures.

Those people just don't understand you see.
After all, what do standards, honor, or morality have to do with a war to protect our way of life?

Enter BZoO Internet Radio. And enter Stephanie's vehicle for satisfying her political bent. Stephanie has her own weekly political talk show - "Politically Sound." The show features the fabulous Stephanie and a guest discussing current issues from the point of view of the average person. No partisan hackery. No spin. No regurgitated talking point. No bullshit. Just the world as she sees it each week.

So, if you like politics. If you appreciate all that Stephanie is trying to do here to support others and want to help support her in return, go give Politically Sound a listen. New shows premier each Monday and get repeated through the week. It is also available via podcast. And if you have any feedback about the show, she'd love to hear it.

MY FANS

has 8 fan(s)

View All My Fans

My Comments

From: Michael Canter
27 May 2008, 11:07 am Check out the NEW on line E-Magazine SonicBytes featuring CD Reviews, Interviews, Member News, Music News, SonicJive Merchandise and some really *COOL MUSIC!!!* And thank you for being a member of SonicJive.com

From: Michael Canter
03 Jul 2007, 1:07 pm

From: Sheryl
08 Jun 2007, 3:05 pm thanks for the add!!!!

From: Sheryl
06 Jun 2007, 6:39 pm sorry i didn't get to pop your comment cherry!!! it's my job on here to be the comment cherry popper, but i slacked and missed out on a few.enjoy the site.

From: Michael Canter
31 May 2007, 7:42 pm I added your banner into our ad rotation and I am looking forward to listening to your show. mike

From: Michael Canter
31 May 2007, 7:29 pm Thank You For Joining SonicJive Welcome to the most exciting social network on the Web. We hope you meet many, many people who share your music and video tastes. To invite your friends to join SonicJive go to MEMBER INVITES and follow the simple instructions. We are giving away $10 in SonicJive downloadable music when you invite 20 friends who join SonicJive. When you have a moment we would love some feedback. Please try and do everything you can with SonicJive: browse and "friend" other members, communicate with them, connect in our chat rooms and forums--try everything! Check out our staff E-ZINE ARTICLES. The links are to the right side of your home page. Say hello to our monthly JiveBabe! Great SonicJive Merchandise, including t-shirts with our ultra-hip logo are available through Cafe Press. And check out our streaming internet radio station, SonicJive Radio and listen to some fantastic unsigned and indie bands that believe me, are as good if not better than most current mainstream music. Your feedback is very important to me. Please message or comment me and let me know what you think. Regards, Michael Canter CEO/Founder

From: Sonic Jive Live
31 May 2007, 7:12 pm Cant wait to hear your show.

From: DJ Rg
31 May 2007, 6:55 pm Hi Lady Good to see you in da 'hood. These people are really good jivers. And they know their music and politics too. @}-------- Always, Rg

View All Comments

Your Login IP Address is: 38.103.63.61